[Форум Rossia.org] [Ответы и комментарии] [Написать ответ]
Отправлено
Andrey Nikolaev 19:21:45 17/03/1999
в ответ на:
А что конкретно вы предлагаете проверять? (0), отправлено
Edward M. 22:48:19 01/03/1999
Proshu proschenija u chitatelej foruma za transliteraziju, ya vam ne budu nadojedat' etim mnogo. Vse moi materiali budut v osnovnom na English. U menja prosto net klaviaturi s kirillizej, a transliterazionnuju raskladku ya ne ljublu, plus escho rabotaju na mnogih raznih mashinah, chto delajet polnuju russifikazuji vsego zverinza ochen' trudojomkoj, no vot koi8 shrifti u menja jest' pochti vezde. As for message of Dusty I do confirm all he said as it was me who told him all that stuff. I can't provide a reliable source on such a bot as I found this reference in one of the USENET groups. My search in Dejanews doesn't give me anything right now, but I'll try once more. Further, yesterday I found another interesting message in newsgroups: From: garabet@west.net Newsgroups: soc.culture.iraq Subject: API "nuclear" bunker bomb strike report mysteriously pulled out Message-ID: <36e18990.6603274@news.west.net> I picked up this interesting Usenet exchange about a an API bunker bomb strike report that was mysteriously pulled out Bunker Busters Already. Author: Morpheus Date: 1999/02/24 Forum: misc.activism.militia U.S. war makers and weapon makers, like the shoemaker's elves, work while we sleep. Already developing and deploying the 3rd generation arsenal of nuclear weapons, while we are still arguing about the morality of the 1st one, they invented and added the "Bunker Buster" to their inventory. The bunker buster is a needle-shaped bomb with an atomic warhead that works on a similar principle to a carpenter's stud gun for shooting studs into cement. From high altitude the nuclear bullet is shot into the earth to a depth of about 100 feet where the atomic charge is set off. The impact of the explosion under such great compression creates a shock wave that shatters rock formations and any underground facilities for a radius of fifty miles or more, depending on the strata formations. I have been anticipating with foreboding the day the U.S. uses these 3rd generation nuclear weapons. Not for myself, but for the future consequences of a country that I love, this sense of dread is founded on the historically proven principle that "no weapon has ever been invented that hasn't been used on humanity." Today, according to a Washington AP report on newsday.com, at 5:30 AM, two bunker busters were shot into Iraqi defense installations. An hour later the news item was pulled and a report was substituted in its place that said two conventional 2000 lb. bombs were used. I hope for the sake of America the original report was a mistake, but I doubt it was, because normally errors are simply corrected in updates not removed completely. Somebody accidentally blew it. Designed specifically for rogue 3rd world states that might dare to defy U.S. world domination, bunker busters are the hickory switch that can send the resonating message, "You can run but you can not hide, Overhead we have high resolution satellites watching your every move and if you go underground we can still get you." The U.S. has conducted several underground nuclear tests in recent months despite her signatures on nuclear nonproliferation treaties and test bans. As was predicted, the Whitehouse, jumping with hyperactive energy and Attention Deficit Disorder from getting new toys, simply took more medication and changed the name of what they are doing in a legalese dodge of responsibility. However, underground atomic testing is not the same as testing the viability of bunker busters. I am told that testing bunker busters is too risky on U.S. soil so it must be done elsewhere. The reason for this is that the U.S. sits on a giant aquifer that has been draining from decades of irrigation for farmlands. A bunker buster in Nevada could cause this deep underground aquifer to collapse, turning the entire midwest into a giant sinkhole with radioactive overtones. Whether this is true or not it is no consolation that the U.S. is willing to put millions of the world's citizens in harms way for reasons that might only benefit a few and temporarily at that. These U.S military assaults are portrayed in the media as a conflict with one individual despot, but the results are a genocidal extermination of a race of people. Extermination as in Holocaust. Re: Bunker Busters Already. Author: Buz Ozburn Date: 1999/02/24 Forum: misc.activism.militia You didn't by chance happen to save a copy of the page, did you? If so please send the link or a copy of the page to me at buzo@bellsouth.net Author: Morpheus Date: 1999/02/25 Forum: misc.activism.militia In answer to your questions, when I read the news server report at 5:30 AM, I wrote the little essay and fell asleep in my chair. At around 9 AM or so, I went back to check the source with the intention of printing it out. That was when I discovered that the source document had been modified. With proof of the source document my statements might only be challenged, but without it it could be completely discredited.... unless others had read the same report in that short space of available time. In the hope that others had also seen it there or somewhere I post the essay anyway. I hate conspiracies and do not want to see another one started. Source information is essential. [skip] So I got one more indirect evidence of such a practice. Yes I know I can't use it in court or anywhere. But honestly I don't have any intention to do so. After all information on those sites is the property of news companies and they always can say it was a correction of staff mistakes. What to track? I'd propose to read headlines / head articles of a few news sites say once in a 15 minutes (there should be fast Internet connection though) and check changes in them (for articles which have same names). Also I'd propose to keep track of articles which were online less then say 6 hours and then disaapeared or undergone major changes. But, I'd propose: 1. Avoid any bulbs around "project". 2. The IP of "attentive reader" should be kept as secret as possible, Ideally I'd distribute sucking function inbetween different computers which are proxy servers already. Preferably they would be interconected directly this or that way. Andrey Nikolaev
Ответы и комментарии: